Abco. Enterprises, Inc. v. Uro-Tile, Inc.
524 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1195, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1998, 1988 WL 47515
Opinion
Upon a review of the record, it is clear that the appellants were independent contractors. See, e.g., Wilson v. Sandstrom, 317 So.2d 732 (Fla.1975), cert. denied sub nom. Alder v. Sandstrom, 423 U.S. 1053, 96 S.Ct. 782, 46 L.Ed.2d 642 (1976); Cantor v. Cochran, 184 So.2d 173 (Fla.1966); Pearson v. Harris, 449 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Therefore, Chapter 448, Florida Statutes, is not applicable. Accordingly, the award of attorney’s fees to appel-lees is reversed. The award of costs is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abco. Enterprises, Inc. v. Uro-Tile, Inc., 524 So. 2d 739, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1195, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1998, 1988 WL 47515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
524 So. 2d 739 (Abco. Enterprises, Inc. v. Uro-Tile, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Sandstrom
317 So. 2d 732 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Pearson v. Harris
449 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Cantor v. Cochran
184 So. 2d 173 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)