Abbott v. State

306 S.W.3d 197, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 319, 2010 WL 933811
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 16, 2010
DocketED 93064
StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 197 (Abbott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abbott v. State, 306 S.W.3d 197, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 319, 2010 WL 933811 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jay Abbott (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order denying his Rule 29.15 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment and Sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. Sup. Cl. R. (2009), unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BOUILLON v. Director of Revenue
306 S.W.3d 197 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 S.W.3d 197, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 319, 2010 WL 933811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-state-moctapp-2010.