Abbott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Abbott v. State

478 So. 2d 885, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2616, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16976

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 22, 1985

DocketNo. 85-633

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 478 So. 2d 885 (Abbott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbott v. State, 478 So. 2d 885, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2616, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16976 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation and his convictions for grand theft and burglary. Of the issues raised alleging errors in sentencing, we find merit in only one issue. We agree with appellant that credit for time served should apply equally to all concurrent sentences. Woolley v. State, 459 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Martin v. State, 452 So.2d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), Bevins v. State, 412 So.2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The record before us reflects that two of appellant’s four concurrent sentences specified 120 days credit for jail time while the other two concurrent sentences authorized seventy-nine days credit for jail time. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the cases bearing circuit court numbers 83-1719 and 83-5782 with directions that the trial court make the appropriate corrections for jail time credit.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation and his convictions for grand theft and burglary. Of the issues raised alleging errors in sentencing, we find merit in only one issue. We agree with appellant that credit for time served should apply equally to all concurrent sentences. Woolley v. State, 459 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Martin v. State, 452 So.2d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), Bevins v. State, 412 So.2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The record before us reflects that two of appellant’s four concurrent sentences specified 120 days credit for jail time while the other two concurrent sentences authorized seventy-nine days credit for jail time. Accordingly, we reverse and remand the cases bearing circuit court numbers 83-1719 and 83-5782 with directions that the trial court make the appropriate corrections for jail time credit.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 So. 2d 885, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2616, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack