Abbott v. Smith

17 A. 410, 64 N.H. 615
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 17 A. 410 (Abbott v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abbott v. Smith, 17 A. 410, 64 N.H. 615 (N.H. 1887).

Opinion

Bingham, J.

The sum due the defendant for his labor at the date of the service of the writ was less than twenty dollars. It does not appear that the claim on which the suit is founded is *616 for necessaries. The trustees are not chargeable, regardless of the question of the validity of the assignment. G . L., c. 249, s. 40.

Osgood & Prescott, for the plaintiff. J. H. Andrews, for the claimants.

Exceptions overruled.

Doe, C. J., was absent; Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Bank of Wheatland v. Bagley Bros.
11 P.2d 572 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1932)
Jones v. Kepford
100 P. 923 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1909)
Jamaica Savings Bank v. Howard's
65 A. 92 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1906)
Neely v. Williams
149 F. 60 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A. 410, 64 N.H. 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-smith-nh-1887.