Abbott v. Holland

20 Ga. 598
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 15, 1856
DocketNo. 112
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ga. 598 (Abbott v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abbott v. Holland, 20 Ga. 598 (Ga. 1856).

Opinion

By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The question in this case is, whether a Constable who has arrested the defendant in a ca. sa. is liable to a rule for an escape, if the defendant has been rescued from him by a “mob?” The Court below held that a Constable is; and this decision, as we think, was right.

The only sort of rescue which, it seems, will excuse the Sheriff from not bringing in the body of a defendant whom he has arrested on a ca. sa. is that which is by the “King’s enemies.” A rescue by “rebels” or “traitors” will not do. Much less, therefore, will a rescue by a mob do. (Sewall on Sh'ff 388-'9; Bac. Abr’g’t “Escape;” Com. Dig. “Rescon’s” (D. 7.)

A Sheriff, by the Judiciary Act of 1799, may be ruled for an escape. (Cobb’s Dig. 1142.)

And by an Act of 1812, “ Constables shall be subject to be ruled by their respective Justice’s Courts,” “ under the same regulations as are pursued in the Superior Court in relation to offiesrs of said Court.” (Cobb’s Dig. 649.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ga. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-holland-ga-1856.