Abbott v. Herring
This text of 468 N.E.2d 680 (Abbott v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The factual determinations made by the Appellate Division more nearly comport with the weight of the evidence, and we find no error in that court’s application of the pertinent rules of law. Plaintiff has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence her entitlement to an easement by implication or prescription.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 N.E.2d 680, 62 N.Y.2d 1028, 479 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-herring-ny-1984.