Abbott v. Ganahl

3 Rob. 337
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedDecember 15, 1842
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Rob. 337 (Abbott v. Ganahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abbott v. Ganahl, 3 Rob. 337 (La. 1842).

Opinion

Bullard J.

The plaintiff, who is the lessee of a Cotton press, sues to recover of the defendants $365 25, for drayage, labor, and rope and bagging. The defendants, after denying the justice of the claim, demand in reconverition about six hundred dollars, for damages sustained by their cotton through the fault of the plain[338]*338tiff. There was a judgment for a part of the plaintiff’s demand, and the defendants have appealed.

The case turns wholly upon questions of fact. The damage sustained was occasioned by a part of the cotton being left exposed to the weather. This appears to have been done with the consent of the defendants, although the original agreement was that it should be under shelter. The District Court rejected the claim of the plaintiff for storage of such parts of the cotton as was thus left exposed, and gave judgment in his favor for the balance. We are not satisfied that it is our duty to reverse the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vial v. Moll
37 La. Ann. 203 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Rob. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-ganahl-la-1842.