Abbott v. Dir.

2015 Ark. App. 221

• Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
• Decided: April 8, 2015
• Docket: E-14-718
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 221

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. E-14-718

Opinion Delivered April 8, 2015 RENEE ABBOTT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW V. [NO. 2014-BR-01920]

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, and JB HUNT TRANSPORT, INC.

APPELLEES REMANDED

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge

Renee Abbott appeals the Arkansas Board of Review decision to deny her

unemployment benefits. The issue is whether Ms. Abbott engaged in misconduct when

she allegedly failed to text-message, or otherwise notify her employer, that she would not

be in to work; however, we are not able to address the issue on the merits at this time

because of a question of the record’s accuracy is presented for our review. The case is

remanded with the instruction that the record be clarified and, if necessary, corrected.

After a thorough review of the record, it appears that there is a discrepancy that

cannot be overlooked. Specifically, the copy of policies and procedures provided by JB

Hunt appear to be for a company named “Vons.” The record offers no explanation for

the inclusion of the policy manual for “Vons” and not JB Hunt. 1 Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 221

Deficiencies in the record on appeal must be addressed if they hinder our review of

the merits. In the event of a material omission or misstatement, we may sua sponte direct

the record to be settled. Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e); see also Heard v. Regions Bank, 369

Ark. 274, 276–77, 253 S.W.3d 422, 424 (2007) (per curiam). We therefore remand to the

Board of Review with instructions to ascertain if a mistake has been made and, if so, to

provide notice to the parties and correct the record accordingly.

Remanded.

HARRISON and HIXSON, JJ., agree.

Renee Abbott, pro se appellant.

Phyllis Edwards, Associate General Counsel, for appellee.