Abbott v. Burke
This text of 832 A.2d 906 (Abbott v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
dissenting from the Order, would grant no further extension of the June 11, 2002, stay of implementation of Abbott IV or Abbott V. She joined in that Order solely because it was based on an application by both parties who expressed a commitment to cooperative resolution of the long-simmering Abbott dispute. Through the mediated Order of June 24, 2003, the parties have exhausted their common ground. There is therefore no further reason for delay. Although the State is facing financial difficulties, as are other states and the federal government, our constitutional mandates regarding the education of all of our children cannot be diluted in reliance thereon.
[600]*600Concurring—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, and WALLACE-4.
Dissenting—Justice LONG—1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
832 A.2d 906, 177 N.J. 596, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-burke-nj-2003.