Abbott v. Board of Trustees
This text of 1978 OK 129 (Abbott v. Board of Trustees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W. Rogers Abbott II (Abbott), a landowner, sought to enjoin the levy and assessment of taxes for the benefit of Oscar Rose Junior College District, an area school district1 (Oscar Rose), as against real property located within the territory of what was formerly Pleasant Hills School District in Oklahoma County, D-45. That dependent school district was annexed to Midwest City-Del City School District, 1-52.
Trial was to the court and basically on stipulation by the parties. No principal facts are in dispute. Pleasant Hills School District, a dependent school district, was annexed to Midwest City-Del City School District, an independent school district. At time of annexation, the real property with.in the annexing school district was subject to levy and assessment of taxes for Oscar Rose Junior College District, an area school district. Based on the annexation of Pleasant Hills with Midwest City-Del City, real property within the annexed Pleasant Hills was made subject to the Oscar Rose assessment. Abbott, as a landowner in the annexed school district, sought an injunction to prevent enforcement of the Oscar Rose tax against real property located within the territory of the annexed dependent school district. The trial court refused the injunction. Abbott appealed.
Abbott argues (1) there must be compliance with 70 O.S.1971, § 4403(b)2 for the [1100]*1100territory within Pleasant Hills school district to be annexed to the community junior college school district; (2) Pleasant Hills school district electors have not voted on the levy as required by Okla.Const., art. 10, § 9B; (3) and position of the proponents of the tax violates 70 O.S.1971, § 4411,3 for that argument allows control to be removed from State Regents of Higher Education and places it with the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education.
Proponents for the levy and assessment, appellees, contend (1) § 44104 controls and allows a community maintaining a community junior college to become an area school district (area technical school district) making 70 O.S.1971, § 14 — 1085 applicable as to the annexing of territory in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education that provide the territory of an annexed school district becomes a part of an area school district if the annexing school district is a part of an area school district; 6 and (2) § 4411 is not applicable to Oscar Rose.
Oscar Rose was established as a community junior college under authority of 70 [1101]*1101O.S.Supp.1967, §§ 4401 to 4409. An amendment to § 4403 in 19687 allowed additional territory to be annexed to the community and requires approval by the legal voters in the territory proposed to be annexed. Another 1968 Act,8 of which § 1 is now § 4410, allowed a community maintaining a community junior college established under §§ 4401 to 4409 to become an area school district (area technical school district) and made applicable (to a community maintaining a community junior college becoming an area school district) the laws applicable to other area school districts, including laws authorizing tax levies and laws pertaining to eligibility for participation in federal funds. Section 2 of that same act, now § 4411, allowed any two-year college that is part of the State System of Higher Education to also become an area school district but the taxing authority granted to a community maintaining a community junior college was denied.
Oscar Rose, a community junior college, complied with § 4410. By so doing, the community maintaining that community junior college became an area school district with laws applicable to other area school districts also applicable to it except that the governing board remained the Board of Trustees of the community junior college rather than a board of education as provided to govern area school districts organized under § 14-108. Sub-section E, § 14 — 108 allows territory to be annexed to an area school district in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education. Those rules provide that with the annexing of territory by a dependent or independent school district already a part of an area school district then the territory of the annexed dependent or independent school district becomes a part of the area school district (area technical school district).
Here, Oscar Rose was organized as a community junior college. If its sole status had remained that of a community junior college, then annexation of additional territory could come only through § 4403 and Abbott would be correct. However, that junior college complied with § 4410 and the community maintaining it became an area school district. As an area school district, §§ 14-108 E is applicable. That sub-section allows annexation of territory to the area school district under the rules of the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education. Those rules make the territory of annexed dependent school district, Pleasant Hills, a part of the area school district, Oscar Rose, for the annexing independent school district, Midwest City-Del City, was already a part of the Oscar Rose area school district at the time of the annexation. In voting for the annexation, the electors voted to become a part of the Oscar Rose area school district. The tax was levied as authorized by an area school district and not as a community maintaining a community junior college. Legislative acts are to be construed in such manner as to reconcile the different provisions and render them consistent and harmonious, and give intelligent effect to each. Eason Oil Company v. Corporation Commission, Okl., 535 P.2d 283 (1975). Section 4403 applies to a community maintaining a community junior college. Section 4410, with its effect as to applicable law, applies to a community maintaining a community junior college that becomes an area school district thereunder. We find no conflict. We hold the territory of the annexed dependent school district is subject to the levied and assessed tax.
As previously observed, § 4410 was § 1 of Laws 1968, c. 278. It authorized a community maintaining a community junior college to become an area technical school district. Section 4411 was § 2 of that same law. It authorized a two-year college that is a part of the State System of Higher Education to become a similar area school district. The latter section refused the tax[1102]*1102ing authority or to affect control in the governing boards and the State Regents for Higher Education. In the present case, we need not consider § 4411, for it is not applicable to Oscar Rose as a part of the State System of Higher Education and as relating to operation as a technical area school district. Oscar Rose Junior College was authorized as an integral part of the State System of Higher Education under certain conditions. 70 O.S.Supp.1973, § 4423. However, subsection B of that section, and now both sub-sections B and C as amended by Laws 1974, c. 33,9 continues the technical area school district in accordance with 70 O.S.1971, § 4410, and not § 4411. The argument by Abbott, that use of rules prescribed by the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education on annexing territory as authorized by 70 O.S.1971, § 14-108 affects control as prohibited by § 4411, is not persuasive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1978 OK 129, 586 P.2d 1098, 1978 Okla. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-board-of-trustees-okla-1978.