Abbott v. Abbott
This text of 97 A. 976 (Abbott v. Abbott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The test to determine whether the defendant is entitled to the relief prayed for is not, as the plaintiff contends, to inquire how the defendant obtained possession' of the property; Emery v. Band, 76 N. H. 483, 489; White v. Poole, 74 N. H. 71; but whether it is equitable for the plaintiff to cause the property to be sold; Prescott v. Jenness, 77 N. H. 84; and all fair minded men will agree that if the facts stated in the answer are true it would be inequitable for the plaintiff to cause the property to be sold without first doing whatever is reasonably necessary to secure the defendant from the loss she would sustain because of having improved the property at the plaintiff’s request and in rebanee on her promise not to dispose of it in her (the defendant’s) lifetime.
Plaintiff’s exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A. 976, 78 N.H. 134, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbott-v-abbott-nh-1916.