Abbot v. Ross

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Abbot v. Ross

9 App. D.C. 289, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3113

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 5, 1896

DocketNos. 624 and 625

StatusPublished

This text of 9 App. D.C. 289 (Abbot v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbot v. Ross, 9 App. D.C. 289, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3113 (D.C. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Alvey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It appears from the record in these cases that the decree appealed from was entered in the court below in pursuance of the mandate issued by this court on the 11th day of May, 1896, in case No. 552, on the docket of this court, and in pursuance of the opinion of this court in that case, and that the questions of law involved in this appeal aré the same as those then considered and passed upon by this court. District of Columbia v. Armes, 8 App. D. C. 393.

The decree now appealed from, which is the decree of the [290]*290Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, holding a District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, entered June 1, 1896, must therefore, for the reasons fully-stated in the opinion of this court above referred to, be affirmed, with costs; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Alvey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It appears from the record in these cases that the decree appealed from was entered in the court below in pursuance of the mandate issued by this court on the 11th day of May, 1896, in case No. 552, on the docket of this court, and in pursuance of the opinion of this court in that case, and that the questions of law involved in this appeal aré the same as those then considered and passed upon by this court. District of Columbia v. Armes, 8 App. D. C. 393.

The decree now appealed from, which is the decree of the [290]*290Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, holding a District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, entered June 1, 1896, must therefore, for the reasons fully-stated in the opinion of this court above referred to, be affirmed, with costs; and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 App. D.C. 289, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbot-v-ross-dc-1896.