Abbasi ex rel. Estate of Abbasi v. Abbasi

Fourth Circuit

Abbasi ex rel. Estate of Abbasi v. Abbasi

474 F. App'x 304

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 28, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1280

StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 304 (Abbasi ex rel. Estate of Abbasi v. Abbasi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbasi ex rel. Estate of Abbasi v. Abbasi, 474 F. App'x 304 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Athar A. Abbasi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and the court’s text order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated by the district court and affirm the denial of reconsideration. Abbasi v. Abbasi, No. 8:10-cv-03551-PJM, 2011 WL 6939328 (D. Md. Dec. 29, 2011) & (Mar. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Athar A. Abbasi appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and the court’s text order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated by the district court and affirm the denial of reconsideration. Abbasi v. Abbasi, No. 8:10-cv-03551-PJM, 2011 WL 6939328 (D. Md. Dec. 29, 2011) & (Mar. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 F. App'x 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbasi-ex-rel-estate-of-abbasi-v-abbasi-ca4-2012.