Abbas Hassain v. J.C. Johnson

Ninth Circuit

Abbas Hassain v. J.C. Johnson

790 F.2d 1420, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25531

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 1986

Docket83-6252

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 790 F.2d 1420 (Abbas Hassain v. J.C. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbas Hassain v. J.C. Johnson, 790 F.2d 1420, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25531 (9th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Abbas Hassain, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his complaint seeking both release from confinement and money damages from J.C. Johnson, a federal prison official. The court treated the complaint as a petition for habeas corpus and a separate Bivens action. Hassain contends that Johnson’s “refusal” to follow a Bureau of Prisons policy statement and Hassain’s transfer to a higher security prison while he was serving a disciplinary sanction violated his eighth amendment rights.

The district court properly denied appellant’s petition for habeas corpus because he filed it in California and not in Arizona, the district where he is confined. United States v. Giddings, 740 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.1984). Appellant’s transfer from Lompoc, California, to the more secure prison at Oxford, Wisconsin, did not violate his rights under the eighth amend *1421 ment. Bono v. Saxbe, 620 F.2d 609, 611 (7th Cir.1980). His claim for money damages is frivolous. See Floyd v. Henderson, 456 F.2d 1117, 1119 (5th Cir.1972).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Abbas Hassain, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his complaint seeking both release from confinement and money damages from J.C. Johnson, a federal prison official. The court treated the complaint as a petition for habeas corpus and a separate Bivens action. Hassain contends that Johnson’s “refusal” to follow a Bureau of Prisons policy statement and Hassain’s transfer to a higher security prison while he was serving a disciplinary sanction violated his eighth amendment rights.

The district court properly denied appellant’s petition for habeas corpus because he filed it in California and not in Arizona, the district where he is confined. United States v. Giddings, 740 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.1984). Appellant’s transfer from Lompoc, California, to the more secure prison at Oxford, Wisconsin, did not violate his rights under the eighth amend *1421 ment. Bono v. Saxbe, 620 F.2d 609, 611 (7th Cir.1980). His claim for money damages is frivolous. See Floyd v. Henderson, 456 F.2d 1117, 1119 (5th Cir.1972).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

790 F.2d 1420, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbas-hassain-v-jc-johnson-ca9-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack