Abbagnaro v. Anderson

543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 814, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 264
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJune 10, 1988
Docket6396
StatusPublished

This text of 543 A.2d 306 (Abbagnaro v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abbagnaro v. Anderson, 543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 814, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 264 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff is appealing from the judgment for the defendant rendered after the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Our review of the record and the pertinent documents fully support the trial court’s determination that there was no genuine issue of a material fact. See, e.g., Pacileo v. Morganti, Inc., 10 Conn. App. 261, 522 A.2d 841 (1987); Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capital Crane Co., 6 Conn. App. 60, 504 A.2d 1376, cert. denied, 199 Conn. 807, 808, 508 A.2d 769 (1986).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.
504 A.2d 1376 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)
Pacileo v. Morganti, Inc.
522 A.2d 841 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 814, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbagnaro-v-anderson-connappct-1988.