Abbagnaro v. Anderson
543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 814, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 264
Opinion
The plaintiff is appealing from the judgment for the defendant rendered after the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Our review of the record and the pertinent documents fully support the trial court’s determination that there was no genuine issue of a material fact. See, e.g., Pacileo v. Morganti, Inc., 10 Conn. App. 261, 522 A.2d 841 (1987); Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capital Crane Co., 6 Conn. App. 60, 504 A.2d 1376, cert. denied, 199 Conn. 807, 808, 508 A.2d 769 (1986).
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abbagnaro v. Anderson, 543 A.2d 306, 15 Conn. App. 814, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 264 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).
543 A.2d 306 (Abbagnaro v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.
504 A.2d 1376 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)
Pacileo v. Morganti, Inc.
522 A.2d 841 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1987)