Abbadessa v. Sullivan

Connecticut Superior Court

Abbadessa v. Sullivan

11 Conn. Super. Ct. 409

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1943

DocketFile No. 63269

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Conn. Super. Ct. 409 (Abbadessa v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abbadessa v. Sullivan, 11 Conn. Super. Ct. 409 (Colo. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

These parties entered into an arbitration. An award of arbitration cannot be repudiated by the mere act of one of the parties. It has the effect of a judgment.Lehrman vs. Prague, 115 Conn. 484. This action on the lien is not a repudiation. The arbitration simply fixed the amount that was due. By process of foreclosure of the lien an attempt is being made to collect the arbitrated amount.

The demurrer to the special defense and counterclaim is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

These parties entered into an arbitration. An award of arbitration cannot be repudiated by the mere act of one of the parties. It has the effect of a judgment.Lehrman vs. Prague, 115 Conn. 484. This action on the lien is not a repudiation. The arbitration simply fixed the amount that was due. By process of foreclosure of the lien an attempt is being made to collect the arbitrated amount.

The demurrer to the special defense and counterclaim is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Conn. Super. Ct. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abbadessa-v-sullivan-connsuperct-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack