Abattoir Realty Co. v. Commissioner

3 B.T.A. 415, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2668
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJanuary 21, 1926
DocketDocket No. 3346.
StatusPublished

This text of 3 B.T.A. 415 (Abattoir Realty Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abattoir Realty Co. v. Commissioner, 3 B.T.A. 415, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2668 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[416]*416OPINION.

Sternhagen

: The facts set forth disclose a complete unity of the enterprise, which was inherent in the creation of the Realty Co. and has remained so since. The Cincinnati Co. has assumed the material responsibilities of the Realty Co. and dominates it completely. It owns all the common stock and its stockholders own two-thirds of the preferred. The directors are such persons as the Cincinnati Co. selects. The right of preferred stockholders to elect a majority of the directors is controlled by the Cincinnati Co. and its stockholders. The remaining preferred stockholders, even were they hostile to the Cincinnati Co. and its interests and were to vote or act in unison, could not be effectively adverse to the Cincinnati Co. But, so far as this record shows, there is no diversity of interest. Taking all [417]*417the circumstances, together, we are oí opinion that the two corporations were affiliated within the taxable years in question.

On reference to the Board, Smith and TRAMmell dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Abattoir Realty Co.
3 B.T.A. 415 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 415, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abattoir-realty-co-v-commissioner-bta-1926.