Abatangelo v. Barrios-Paoli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abatangelo v. Barrios-Paoli

268 A.D.2d 212, 700 N.Y.S.2d 681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 4, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 212 (Abatangelo v. Barrios-Paoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abatangelo v. Barrios-Paoli, 268 A.D.2d 212, 700 N.Y.S.2d 681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered August 27, 1998, which denied petitioners’ application pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging the validity of Police Sergeants Examination 1528 administered on October 16, 1993, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondents determined that the results of the subject exam were not compromised by cheating. An investigation thoroughly addressed and rejected petitioners’ allegation that a certain individual had illegally obtained the exam before it was administered. Nothing in the record warrants judicial rejection of respondents’ determination as irrational. Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered August 27, 1998, which denied petitioners’ application pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging the validity of Police Sergeants Examination 1528 administered on October 16, 1993, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondents determined that the results of the subject exam were not compromised by cheating. An investigation thoroughly addressed and rejected petitioners’ allegation that a certain individual had illegally obtained the exam before it was administered. Nothing in the record warrants judicial rejection of respondents’ determination as irrational. Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 212, 700 N.Y.S.2d 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abatangelo-v-barrios-paoli-nyappdiv-2000.