Abat v. Wiltz

14 La. 448
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 15, 1840·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Morphy, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant being sued as drawer of several notes, answers, that plaintiff has no interest in them ; that they belong to Laurent Millaudon, against whom he has a good defence. Plaintiff’s silence, on the interrogatories put to him to prove his want of interest, authorized defendant to make out any just defence he might have had against Millaudon ; this he has not done. Appellee prays for damages on the ground that this appeal is frivolous and taken for delay ; we cannot but view it in the same light.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment below be affirmed, with costs and ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abat v. Wiltz, 14 La. 448 (La. 1840).

14 La. 448 (Abat v. Wiltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davison v. Ernst
163 So. 752 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1935)
King v. Atkins
33 La. Ann. 1057 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1881)