Abarno v. Abarno

172 N.E.2d 290, 9 N.Y.2d 636
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 172 N.E.2d 290 (Abarno v. Abarno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abarno v. Abarno, 172 N.E.2d 290, 9 N.Y.2d 636 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Judgment reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term to find the facts which it is deems essential to its decision as required by section 440 of the Civil Practice Act (Mason v. Lory Dress Co., 277 App. Div. 660). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Field, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Dye dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 N.E.2d 290, 9 N.Y.2d 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abarno-v-abarno-ny-1961.