Abady v. Pennsylvania Railroad
159 N.E.2d 203, 6 N.Y.2d 757, 186 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1405
This text of 159 N.E.2d 203 (Abady v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Abady v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 159 N.E.2d 203, 6 N.Y.2d 757, 186 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1405 (N.Y. 1959).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Burke. Chief Judge Conway and Judges Froessel and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that the circumstantial evidence created a question of fact to be submitted to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crosland v. New York City Transit Authority
498 N.E.2d 143 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
159 N.E.2d 203, 6 N.Y.2d 757, 186 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abady-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ny-1959.