Abadie v. United States

Supreme Court

Abadie v. United States

149 U.S. 261, 13 S. Ct. 836, 37 L. Ed. 726, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2292

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 1, 1893

Docket260

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 U.S. 261 (Abadie v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abadie v. United States, 149 U.S. 261, 13 S. Ct. 836, 37 L. Ed. 726, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2292 (1893).

Pincite

Opinion

*262 The Chief Justice :

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California in a proceeding under the act of Congress of February 25, 1885, entitled “An act to prevent unlawful’ occupancy of the public lands,” 23 Stat. 321, c. 149, whereby appellant was directed to remove, a fence and enclosure from certain sections of land therein described, in default of which it was decreed that the same should be destroyed by the marshal for said district. The value of the fence was claimed to exceed $5000; but the fence was not the matter in dispute, nor was the appellant deprived thereof. For want of the jurisdictional amount, Cameron v. United States, 146 U. S. 533, the appeal must be

Dismissed*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*262 The Chief Justice :

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California in a proceeding under the act of Congress of February 25, 1885, entitled “An act to prevent unlawful’ occupancy of the public lands,” 23 Stat. 321, c. 149, whereby appellant was directed to remove, a fence and enclosure from certain sections of land therein described, in default of which it was decreed that the same should be destroyed by the marshal for said district. The value of the fence was claimed to exceed $5000; but the fence was not the matter in dispute, nor was the appellant deprived thereof. For want of the jurisdictional amount, Cameron v. United States, 146 U. S. 533, the appeal must be

Dismissed*

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 U.S. 261, 13 S. Ct. 836, 37 L. Ed. 726, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abadie-v-united-states-scotus-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack