Abad v. Jawokowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abad v. Jawokowski

248 A.D.2d 572, 669 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 572 (Abad v. Jawokowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abad v. Jawokowski, 248 A.D.2d 572, 669 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the County of Nassau appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated November 27, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs application for leave to serve a late notice of claim on it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

■ Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiffs application (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Sverdlin v City of New York, 229 AD2d 544; Matter of Gallino v Village of Shoreham, 222 AD2d 506; Matter of Farrell v City of New York, 191 AD2d 698).

Copertino, J. P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the County of Nassau appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated November 27, 1996, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs application for leave to serve a late notice of claim on it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

■ Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiffs application (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Matter of Sverdlin v City of New York, 229 AD2d 544; Matter of Gallino v Village of Shoreham, 222 AD2d 506; Matter of Farrell v City of New York, 191 AD2d 698).

Copertino, J. P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 572, 669 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abad-v-jawokowski-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack