A.B. v. State

212 So. 3d 540, 2017 WL 1040878, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3612
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A.B. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9203
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 2017·No. Case No. 5D17-657·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant AB.’s amended petition seeking emergency habeas corpus relief to obtain her immediate release from her present confinement at Halifax Health. The order of involuntary commitment issued by the lower court pursuant to section 394.467, Florida Statutes (2017), is improper because the evidence presented at the hearing did not establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that A.B. would suffer from neglect, or that she posed a danger to herself or others. See In re Lehrke, 12 So.3d 307, 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Accordingly, A.B. should be immediately discharged if she is still involuntarily committed.

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER and WALLIS, JJ., and JACOBUS, B. W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A.B. v. State, 212 So. 3d 540, 2017 WL 1040878, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3612 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

212 So. 3d 540 (A.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehrke v. State
12 So. 3d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)