Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/A.B. v. State

A.B. v. State

976 So. 2d 106, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2987, 2008 WL 583792
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 2008
DocketNo. 3D07-883
StatusPublished

This text of 976 So. 2d 106 (A.B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.B. v. State, 976 So. 2d 106, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2987, 2008 WL 583792 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A.B. seeks to reverse an adjudication of delinquency and sentence. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the State’s case was based on direct, not circumstantial, evidence, and conclude that there was substantial, competent evidence to support the judgment. See Fitzpatrick v. State, 900 So.2d 495 (Fla.2005); F.D. v. State, 927 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); I.M. v. State, 917 So.2d 927 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fitzpatrick v. State
900 So. 2d 495 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
I.M. v. State
917 So. 2d 927 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
F.D. v. State
927 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
976 So. 2d 106, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2987, 2008 WL 583792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ab-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.