A.B. v. State
976 So. 2d 106, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2987, 2008 WL 583792
Opinion
A.B. seeks to reverse an adjudication of delinquency and sentence. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the State’s case was based on direct, not circumstantial, evidence, and conclude that there was substantial, competent evidence to support the judgment. See Fitzpatrick v. State, 900 So.2d 495 (Fla.2005); F.D. v. State, 927 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); I.M. v. State, 917 So.2d 927 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A.B. v. State, 976 So. 2d 106, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2987, 2008 WL 583792 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
976 So. 2d 106 (A.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fitzpatrick v. State
900 So. 2d 495 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
I.M. v. State
917 So. 2d 927 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
F.D. v. State
927 So. 2d 936 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)