A.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.B. v. State

679 So. 2d 1299, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10156, 1996 WL 547194

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 27, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3060

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 679 So. 2d 1299 (A.B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.B. v. State, 679 So. 2d 1299, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10156, 1996 WL 547194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On appeal, the appellant raises the question whether a person found to be in possession of cocaine inside a baggie can be convicted of both the crime of possession of the drug and of the separate offense of possession of drug paraphernalia. Unfortunately, this issue was not raised below. We observe, however, that apparently the answer is “yes.” See State v. McCray, 561 So.2d 257 (Fla.1990).

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On appeal, the appellant raises the question whether a person found to be in possession of cocaine inside a baggie can be convicted of both the crime of possession of the drug and of the separate offense of possession of drug paraphernalia. Unfortunately, this issue was not raised below. We observe, however, that apparently the answer is “yes.” See State v. McCray, 561 So.2d 257 (Fla.1990).

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 So. 2d 1299, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10156, 1996 WL 547194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ab-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack