A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company
168 N.E. 426, 251 N.Y. 558, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 813
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed with costs on the ground that the agreement whereby the vendor and vendee were to endeavor to dispose of the goods during the pendency of the litigation had the *559 effect of charging the defendant with liability for storage of any goods not sold, even if such liability might otherwise have been disclaimed.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company, 168 N.E. 426, 251 N.Y. 558, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 813 (N.Y. 1929).
168 N.E. 426 (A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
A.B. Murray Co. Inc. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.
168 N.E. 441 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)