A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company

168 N.E. 426, 251 N.Y. 558, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 813
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 11, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 N.E. 426 (A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.B. Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Company, 168 N.E. 426, 251 N.Y. 558, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 813 (N.Y. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed with costs on the ground that the agreement whereby the vendor and vendee were to endeavor to dispose of the goods during the pendency of the litigation had the *559 effect of charging the defendant with liability for storage of any goods not sold, even if such liability might otherwise have been disclaimed.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A.B. Murray Co. Inc. v. Lidgerwood Manufacturing Co.
168 N.E. 441 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E. 426, 251 N.Y. 558, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ab-murray-co-v-lidgerwood-manufacturing-company-ny-1929.