Aaron v. United States

52 Fed. Cl. 20, 2002 U.S. Claims LEXIS 37, 2002 WL 331707
United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 28, 2002·No. No. 00-315C·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Partial judgment in this case was entered February 21, 2002, pursuant to Rule 54(b), with respect to certain named plaintiffs. Defendant has filed a motion to amend, pursuant to Rules 59 and 60, because the court inadvertently omitted dismissal of the UNI-COR claims of Leonard Graves and Kevin L. Sherrod. For good cause shown, and without opposition by plaintiffs, defendant’s motion is granted. Accordingly, the clerk is directed to vacate the judgment of February 21, 2002, and enter a new judgment dismissing, pursuant to Rule 54(b), all claims of the plaintiffs named in the attached list for lack of jurisdiction. In addition, the UNICOR claims of plaintiffs Joseph Ludgate, Leonard Graves, and Kevin L. Sherrod are dismissed. They remain plaintiffs with respect to their employment by the Bureau. No costs. Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aaron v. United States, 52 Fed. Cl. 20, 2002 U.S. Claims LEXIS 37, 2002 WL 331707 (uscfc 2002).

52 Fed. Cl. 20 (Aaron v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slattery v. United States
635 F.3d 1298 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
Aaron v. United States
56 Fed. Cl. 98 (Federal Claims, 2003)