Aaron v. State
This text of 686 So. 2d 620 (Aaron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Bland Aaron appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking in a controlled substance. Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Aaron filed a pro se brief. After our inde[621]*621pendent review of the record, we find error only in the imposition of a discretionary cost that was not orally announced at sentencing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we strike the $2 assessed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1991).
Affirmed; $2 cost stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 620, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11616, 1996 WL 637703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aaron-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.