Aaron v. State

686 So. 2d 620, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11616, 1996 WL 637703
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1996·No. No. 94-02489·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Bland Aaron appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking in a controlled substance. Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Aaron filed a pro se brief. After our inde[621]*621pendent review of the record, we find error only in the imposition of a discretionary cost that was not orally announced at sentencing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we strike the $2 assessed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1991).

Affirmed; $2 cost stricken.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and BLUE and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aaron v. State, 686 So. 2d 620, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11616, 1996 WL 637703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

686 So. 2d 620 (Aaron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)