Aaron v. State

913 So. 2d 1112, 2005 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 110, 2005 WL 1252744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aaron v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 913 So. 2d 1109
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided May 27, 2005·No. CR-02-0390·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, Catherine Aaron pleaded guilty to the unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, a violation of § 13A-12-217, Ala.Code 1975. In an unpublished memorandum issued on September 26, 2003, this Court affirmed Aaron’s conviction. See Aaron v. State, 913 So.2d 1109 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) (Shaw, J., dissenting, joined by Cobb, J.). The Alabama Supreme Court granted Aaron’s petition for the writ of certiorari and, in an opinion issued on April 1, 2005, reversed this Court’s judgment. Ex parte Aaron, 913 So.2d 1110 (Ala.2005).

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this cause remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

McMILLAN, p.j., and COBB, BASCHAB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aaron v. State, 913 So. 2d 1112, 2005 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 110, 2005 WL 1252744 (Ala. Ct. App. 2005).

913 So. 2d 1112 (Aaron v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aaron v. State
913 So. 2d 1109 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
Ex Parte Aaron
913 So. 2d 1110 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2005)