Aaron v. State
This text of 913 So. 2d 1112 (Aaron v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court
Pursuant to a plea agreement with the State, Catherine Aaron pleaded guilty to the unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, a violation of § 13A-12-217, Ala.Code 1975. In an unpublished memorandum issued on September 26, 2003, this Court affirmed Aaron’s conviction. See Aaron v. State, 913 So.2d 1109 (Ala.Crim.App.2003) (Shaw, J., dissenting, joined by Cobb, J.). The Alabama Supreme Court granted Aaron’s petition for the writ of certiorari and, in an opinion issued on April 1, 2005, reversed this Court’s judgment. Ex parte Aaron, 913 So.2d 1110 (Ala.2005).
In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and this cause remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
913 So. 2d 1112, 2005 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 110, 2005 WL 1252744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aaron-v-state-alacrimapp-2005.