Aaron v. County of Palm Beach
This text of 32 So. 2d 165 (Aaron v. County of Palm Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole question presented on this appeal is the liability vel non of the County in a tort action. The court below answered in the negative. His judgment is affirmed on authority of Keggin v. Hillsborough County, 71 So. 372, 71 Fla. 356; Hillsborough County v. Kensett, 144 So. 393, 107 Fla. 237; City of Tampa v. Easton, 198 So. 753, 145 Fla. 188; Ray v. Marion County, 71 Fed. (2nd) 510; Blashfield Encyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Permanent Edition, paragraph 2891.
The record shows that at the time the alleged tort was committed the County was performing a governmental function.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 So. 2d 165, 159 Fla. 517, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aaron-v-county-of-palm-beach-fla-1947.