Aaron v. County of Palm Beach

32 So. 2d 165, 159 Fla. 517, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 827
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 14, 1947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TERRELL, J.:

The sole question presented on this appeal is the liability vel non of the County in a tort action. The court below answered in the negative. His judgment is affirmed on authority of Keggin v. Hillsborough County, 71 So. 372, 71 Fla. 356; Hillsborough County v. Kensett, 144 So. 393, 107 Fla. 237; City of Tampa v. Easton, 198 So. 753, 145 Fla. 188; Ray v. Marion County, 71 Fed. (2nd) 510; Blashfield Encyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Permanent Edition, paragraph 2891.

The record shows that at the time the alleged tort was committed the County was performing a governmental function.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, C. J., CHAPMAN and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aaron v. County of Palm Beach, 32 So. 2d 165, 159 Fla. 517, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 827 (Fla. 1947).

32 So. 2d 165 (Aaron v. County of Palm Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broward County, Fla. v. Wickman. The Juanita
195 F.2d 614 (Fifth Circuit, 1952)