Aaron Ledell Celestine v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 14, 2022
Docket05-22-00249-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Aaron Ledell Celestine v. the State of Texas (Aaron Ledell Celestine v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aaron Ledell Celestine v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order entered December 16, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00249-CR

AARON LEDELL CELESTINE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F22-00005-I

ORDER

Appellant’s brief is overdue. The brief was originally due August 10, 2022.

We subsequently granted appellant three extensions of time to file the brief, on

August 11, 2022, September 16, 2022, and October 19, 2022. Following the third

extension on October 19, 2022, appellant’s brief was due November 10, 2022. We

cautioned counsel that if the brief were not filed by November 10, 2022, we would

abate the case for the trial court to hold a hearing and determine why the brief has

not been filed. As of the date of this order, appellant’s brief has not been filed. The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make

appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant

desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent,

whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).

If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court

shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d

708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is

indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary

to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which

shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above

order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or

when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aaron Ledell Celestine v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aaron-ledell-celestine-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.