Aaron Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Nolan C. Aspinwell

459 F.2d 1045, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9436
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 22, 1972·No. 71-3221·Published

Opinion

459 F.2d 1045

Aaron KATZ, on behalf of himself and all other persons
similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nolan C. ASPINWELL et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-3221.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 22, 1972.

Robert S. Vance, Birmingham, Ala., Kramer & Labaton, Sidney Kramer, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant; Callaway & Vance, Birmingham, Ala., Joseph Sternberg, New York City, of counsel.

Winston B. McCall, S. P. Keith, Jr., Wm. G. West, Jr., George R. Reynolds, Gilbert E. Johnston, Roderick M. Macleod, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees; Pritchard, McCall & Jones, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel.

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument, the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed upon the written opinion of the District Judge, Katz v. Aspinwell, 342 F.Supp. 286 (N.D., Ala., 1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aaron Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Nolan C. Aspinwell, 459 F.2d 1045, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9436 (5th Cir. 1972).

459 F.2d 1045 (Aaron Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Nolan C. Aspinwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Katz v. Aspinwall
342 F. Supp. 286 (N.D. Alabama, 1971)