Aaron Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Nolan C. Aspinwell

Fifth Circuit

Aaron Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Nolan C. Aspinwell

459 F.2d 1045, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9436

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 1972

Docket71-3221

StatusPublished

This text of 459 F.2d 1045 (Aaron Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Nolan C. Aspinwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aaron Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Nolan C. Aspinwell, 459 F.2d 1045, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9436 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

459 F.2d 1045

Aaron KATZ, on behalf of himself and all other persons
similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nolan C. ASPINWELL et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-3221.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 22, 1972.

Robert S. Vance, Birmingham, Ala., Kramer & Labaton, Sidney Kramer, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant; Callaway & Vance, Birmingham, Ala., Joseph Sternberg, New York City, of counsel.

Winston B. McCall, S. P. Keith, Jr., Wm. G. West, Jr., George R. Reynolds, Gilbert E. Johnston, Roderick M. Macleod, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees; Pritchard, McCall & Jones, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel.

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument, the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed upon the written opinion of the District Judge, Katz v. Aspinwell, 342 F.Supp. 286 (N.D., Ala., 1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI