Aaron Echols v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00380-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
AARON ECHOLS, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Aaron Echols, attempts to appeal his conviction for injury to a child,
elderly or disabled individual. The trial court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On July 26, 2010, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.
On July 29, 2010, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response
does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that
appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 24th day of August, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aaron Echols v. State (Aaron Echols v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.