Aaron Augustis Witts v. Commonwealth
This text of Aaron Augustis Witts v. Commonwealth (Aaron Augustis Witts v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia
AARON AUGUSTIS WITTS
v. Record No. 0078-94-1 ORDER
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC Thomas W. Carpenter (Overman, Cowardin & Martin, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant.
Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
By memorandum opinion issued April 4, 1995, a panel of this
Court affirmed the conviction of Aaron Augustis Witts (appellant)
for use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public
airways, in violation of Code § 18.2-427. Witts v. Commonwealth,
No. 0078-94-1, 1995 WL 143096 (Va. Ct. App. April 4, 1995)
(Benton, J., dissenting). On appellant's motion, we stayed the
mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc which was heard on October 5, 1995.
For the reasons stated in the panel majority opinion, the
stay of the mandate of the April 4, 1995 opinion is vacated, and
we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder, and Fitzpatrick, for the
reasons stated in Judge Benton's panel dissent, would reverse the
conviction. This order shall be published and certified to the trial
court. Affirmed.
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aaron Augustis Witts v. Commonwealth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aaron-augustis-witts-v-commonwealth-vactapp-1995.