Aaron Augustis Witts v. Commonwealth
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia
AARON AUGUSTIS WITTS v. Record No. 0078-94-1 ORDER COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
Thomas W. Carpenter (Overman, Cowardin & Martin, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant.
Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
By memorandum opinion issued April 4, 1995, a panel of this Court affirmed the conviction of Aaron Augustis Witts (appellant) for use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public airways, in violation of Code § 18.2-427. Witts v. Commonwealth, No. 0078-94-1, 1995 WL 143096 (Va. Ct. App. April 4, 1995) (Benton, J., dissenting). On appellant's motion, we stayed the
mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc which was heard on October 5, 1995.
For the reasons stated in the panel majority opinion, the stay of the mandate of the April 4, 1995 opinion is vacated, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder, and Fitzpatrick, for the reasons stated in Judge Benton's panel dissent, would reverse the conviction.
This order shall be published and certified to the trial
court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aaron Augustis Witts v. Commonwealth (Aaron Augustis Witts v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.