Aar Airlift Group, Inc. v. United States
This text of Aar Airlift Group, Inc. v. United States (Aar Airlift Group, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1151 Filed: September 20, 2017
******************************************* * Bid Protest; Protective Order. AAR AIRLIFT GROUP, INC., * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant, * * and * * CONSTRUCTION HELICOPTERS, INC D/B/A * CHI AVIATION and COLUMBIA * HELICOPTERS, INC., * * Intervenor-Defendants. * * * *******************************************
ORDER
On August 25, 2017, the court issued a Protective Order covering the parties in the above- captioned case. ECF No. 19.
Between August 25, 2017 and September 20, 2017, Mark Arena, a Senior Physical Scientist at Rand Corporation, Brian Persons, a Senior Management Scientist at Rand Corporation, and Eric Valle, a representative of the Section 809 Panel, requested to attend the September 20, 2017 Hearing in the above-captioned case, in connection with reports they are preparing for Congress.
Under these circumstances, the court required, and the parties agreed, that Mr. Arena, Mr. Persons, and Mr. Valle be subject to the same terms and conditions of the August 25, 2017 Protective Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Susan G. Braden SUSAN G. BRADEN, Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aar Airlift Group, Inc. v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aar-airlift-group-inc-v-united-states-uscfc-2017.