Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al.

Opinion

AAMIR SALADIN RUSHDAN, No. 2:24-cv-2183 CSK P

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER Y. MANSOUR, et al., Defendants. On October 31, 2025, defendant Y. Mansour filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On April 15, 2025, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may constitute grounds for denial of the motion. (ECF No. 22 at 7-8 (citing Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)).) Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not under this rule—except one for lack of jurisdiction, ] improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19—operates as an adjudication on the merits.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules g || and acourt order. Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Dated: December 9, 2025 4 aA Cnn Spo \L CHI S00 KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Asush2183.nop