Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al.

E.D. California

Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al.

DecidedDecember 9, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-02183

StatusUnknown

This text of Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al. (Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AAMIR SALADIN RUSHDAN, No. 2:24-cv-2183 CSK P

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER 14 Y. MANSOUR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On October 31, 2025, defendant Y. Mansour filed a motion for summary judgment 18 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. 19 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 20 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 21 the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On April 15, 2025, plaintiff was advised of 22 the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may 23 constitute grounds for denial of the motion. (ECF No. 22 at 7-8 (citing Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 24 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)).) 25 Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 26 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to 27 dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any 28 dismissal not under this rule—except one for lack of jurisdiction, ] improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19—operates as 5 an adjudication on the merits.

3 || Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 4 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date 5 || of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. 6 || Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack 7 || of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules g || and acourt order. Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 9 || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 10 11 || Dated: December 9, 2025 4 aA 1 Cnn Spo \L CHI S00 KIM 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 || Asush2183.nop 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AAMIR SALADIN RUSHDAN, No. 2:24-cv-2183 CSK P

12 Plaintiff,

13 v. ORDER 14 Y. MANSOUR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On October 31, 2025, defendant Y. Mansour filed a motion for summary judgment 18 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. 19 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 20 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 21 the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On April 15, 2025, plaintiff was advised of 22 the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may 23 constitute grounds for denial of the motion. (ECF No. 22 at 7-8 (citing Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 24 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)).) 25 Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 26 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to 27 dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any 28 dismissal not under this rule—except one for lack of jurisdiction, ] improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19—operates as 5 an adjudication on the merits.

3 || Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 4 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date 5 || of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. 6 || Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack 7 || of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules g || and acourt order. Said failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 9 || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 10 11 || Dated: December 9, 2025 4 aA 1 Cnn Spo \L CHI S00 KIM 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 || Asush2183.nop 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Aamir Saladin Rushdan v. Y. Mansour, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aamir-saladin-rushdan-v-y-mansour-et-al-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack