AAEB5 Fund 17 LLC v. Duval & Stachenfeld, LLP

S.D. New York

AAEB5 Fund 17 LLC v. Duval & Stachenfeld, LLP

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 2, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-03588·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK nance ne ne ne ene eee eee ene eeneeneneeee KX ZSC NYACK HOTEL FUND LLC, et al, : 23 Civ. 3588 (PAE) Plaintiffs, : : ORDER : DUVAL & STACHENFELD, LLP, ef al, Defendants. :

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On April 28, 2023, plaintiffs filed the complaint in this case, asserting diversity of citizenship of the parties as the sole basis for federal jurisdiction, Dkt. 1. On review,.it appears to the Court that plaintiffs are limited liability companies (“LLC”). The citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its constituent members. While the complaint alleges that plaintiffs are

organized under the laws of Delaware, and have their principal places of business in New Jersey, the complaint does not also allege the citizenship of the LLC’s members. Jd. J 1-5. To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, plaintiffs must therefore file an amended complaint, which must allege (1) the citizenship of natural persons who are members of the LLCs and (2) the place of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entities who are members of the LLCs. See Handelsman v. Bedford Village Assoc. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000) (citing Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998)); Strother v. Harte, 171 F. Supp. 2d 203, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (“For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”). If plaintiffs are unable to amend the complaint to allege truthfully complete

diversity based upon the citizenship of each constituent person or entity of the LLCs, then the complaint will be dismissed, without prejudice, for want of subject matter jurisdiction. See Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts Assocs., 915 F.2d 81, 83 (2d Cir. 1990) (“[SJubject matter jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine gua non for the exercise of federal judicial power.”). To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, plaintiffs must therefore file an amended complaint. Accordingly, in the interests of justice, the Court grants plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) to allege the citizenships of all members of the LLCs in this case by May 16, 2023. SO ORDERED. anf A poy Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge

Dated: May 2, 2023 _ . New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK nance ne ne ne ene eee eee ene eeneeneneeee KX ZSC NYACK HOTEL FUND LLC, et al, : 23 Civ. 3588 (PAE) Plaintiffs, : : ORDER : DUVAL & STACHENFELD, LLP, ef al, Defendants. :

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On April 28, 2023, plaintiffs filed the complaint in this case, asserting diversity of citizenship of the parties as the sole basis for federal jurisdiction, Dkt. 1. On review,.it appears to the Court that plaintiffs are limited liability companies (“LLC”). The citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its constituent members. While the complaint alleges that plaintiffs are

organized under the laws of Delaware, and have their principal places of business in New Jersey, the complaint does not also allege the citizenship of the LLC’s members. Jd. J 1-5. To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, plaintiffs must therefore file an amended complaint, which must allege (1) the citizenship of natural persons who are members of the LLCs and (2) the place of incorporation and principal place of business of any corporate entities who are members of the LLCs. See Handelsman v. Bedford Village Assoc. Ltd. P’ship, 213 F.3d 48, 51-52 (2d Cir. 2000) (citing Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998)); Strother v. Harte, 171 F. Supp. 2d 203, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (“For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.”). If plaintiffs are unable to amend the complaint to allege truthfully complete

diversity based upon the citizenship of each constituent person or entity of the LLCs, then the complaint will be dismissed, without prejudice, for want of subject matter jurisdiction. See Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts Assocs., 915 F.2d 81, 83 (2d Cir. 1990) (“[SJubject matter jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine gua non for the exercise of federal judicial power.”). To enable the Court to determine whether there is diversity of citizenship, plaintiffs must therefore file an amended complaint. Accordingly, in the interests of justice, the Court grants plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) to allege the citizenships of all members of the LLCs in this case by May 16, 2023. SO ORDERED. anf A poy Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge

Dated: May 2, 2023 _ . New York, New York

AAEB5 Fund 17 LLC v. Duval & Stachenfeld, LLP, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

AAEB5 Fund 17 LLC v. Duval & Stachenfeld, LLP (AAEB5 Fund 17 LLC v. Duval & Stachenfeld, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related