Aadil Ashfaque v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Aadil Ashfaque v. State of Indiana

43 N.E.3d 242, 2015 Ind. LEXIS 851, 2015 WL 5837695

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 2015

Docket49S02-1505-CR-288

StatusPublished

This text of 43 N.E.3d 242 (Aadil Ashfaque v. State of Indiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aadil Ashfaque v. State of Indiana, 43 N.E.3d 242, 2015 Ind. LEXIS 851, 2015 WL 5837695 (Ind. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1404-CR-286

Aadil Ashfaque appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss charges of dealing in and possession of a synthetic drug, namely XLR11 [ (l-(5-fluoropen-tyl)indol-3-yI)-(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclo-propyl)methanone]. For the reasons set forth in our companion decision of Tiplick v. State, also issued today, we find no constitutional or statutory infirmity to these charges, but nevertheless dismiss them due to the inadequacy of the charging information, and remand to the trial court for all other proceedings consistent with that opinion.

RUSH, C.J., and DICKSON, RUCKER, and DAVID, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A02-1404-CR-286

Aadil Ashfaque appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss charges of dealing in and possession of a synthetic drug, namely XLR11 [ (l-(5-fluoropen-tyl)indol-3-yI)-(2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclo-propyl)methanone]. For the reasons set forth in our companion decision of Tiplick v. State, also issued today, we find no constitutional or statutory infirmity to these charges, but nevertheless dismiss them due to the inadequacy of the charging information, and remand to the trial court for all other proceedings consistent with that opinion.

RUSH, C.J., and DICKSON, RUCKER, and DAVID, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 N.E.3d 242, 2015 Ind. LEXIS 851, 2015 WL 5837695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aadil-ashfaque-v-state-of-indiana-ind-2015.