A1-Tray Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

A1-Tray Co. v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 453, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1938

United States Customs Court·Decided May 4, 1950·No. No. 54313; protests 147850-K and 150824-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.

A1-Tray Co. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 453, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1938 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

24 Cust. Ct. 453 (A1-Tray Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.