A. W. Schnitger v. Canoga Electronics Corp.

462 F.2d 628, 174 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 321, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8899
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 20, 1972·No. 71-2614·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Schnitger appeals from a district court order dismissing his complaint for declaratory relief against Canoga Electronics Corporation. We affirm.

Canoga’s subsidiary, Scanbe Manufacturing Corporation, produces electrical circuit board files pursuant to Patent Re. 25,595. Scanbe obtained a judicial decision in 1966 that the patent was valid and that William Tryon, d/b./a Tryon Components Company, was infringing it by making and selling printed circuit card holders and card holder assemblies. The court enjoined Tryon from future infringement.

Schnitger wants to purchase the circuit board files from Tryon, which cannot sell to him because of the 1966 injunction. Hence Schnitger brought this declaratory judgment action seeking a judicial ruling that the Scanbe patent is invalid and that Tryon can sell it despite the 1966 judgment.

Although the district court did not specify the reasons for its dismissal, it appears from the record that Schnitger is in privity with Tryon. The 1966 judgment is res judicata as to Tryon and those who obtain the infringing product from him. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Williams, 246 F.Supp. 626 (W.D.Ark.1965). That judgment provides a complete defense to Schnit-ger’s declaratory judgment action, and the district court properly dismissed it.

The order of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. W. Schnitger v. Canoga Electronics Corp., 462 F.2d 628, 174 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 321, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8899 (9th Cir. 1972).

462 F.2d 628 (A. W. Schnitger v. Canoga Electronics Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Technology Licensing Corp. v. Thomson, Inc.
738 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (E.D. California, 2010)
Pall Corp. v. Fisher Scientific Co.
962 F. Supp. 210 (D. Massachusetts, 1997)
Arco Polymers, Inc. v. STUDIENGESELLSCHAFT KOHLE
555 F. Supp. 547 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1982)
Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corporation
658 F.2d 1106 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)
MPL, Inc. v. Cook
90 F.R.D. 570 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corp.
450 F. Supp. 36 (N.D. Ohio, 1978)
Wallace Clark & Co., Inc. v. Acheson Industries, Inc.
394 F. Supp. 393 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Weston Instruments, Inc. v. Data Technology Corp.
64 F.R.D. 100 (N.D. California, 1974)
Crane Co. v. Aeroquip Corporation
364 F. Supp. 547 (N.D. Illinois, 1973)
Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite Corporation
474 F.2d 1391 (Second Circuit, 1973)
Plumat v. Dunipace
464 F.2d 1402 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1972)