Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/A Vanish Pest Control v. Martinez

A Vanish Pest Control v. Martinez

46 So. 3d 123, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15803, 2010 WL 4059793
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2010
DocketNo. 1D10-0648
StatusPublished

This text of 46 So. 3d 123 (A Vanish Pest Control v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A Vanish Pest Control v. Martinez, 46 So. 3d 123, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15803, 2010 WL 4059793 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the Employer/Carrier challenges an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) granting Claimant’s request to select his own back specialist. Because there is no legal basis to support the JCC’s award of future back treatment with a physician of Claimant’s choice, we REVERSE. See Carmack v. State, Dept. of Agriculture, 31 So.3d 798, 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). The Employer/Carrier shall provide Claimant with a back specialist of the Employer/Carrier’s own choosing.

WOLF, DAVIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carmack v. State, Department of Agriculture
31 So. 3d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 So. 3d 123, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15803, 2010 WL 4059793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-vanish-pest-control-v-martinez-fladistctapp-2010.