A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston
361 F.2d 218
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1966
DocketNo. 409, Docket 30400
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 361 F.2d 218 (A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston, 361 F.2d 218 (2d Cir. 1966).
Opinion
We affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint seeking to stay arbitration for the reasons stated in Judge McLean’s opinion below, 253 F.Supp. 509.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baron Buick, Inc. v. Local 259
563 F. Supp. 688 (E.D. New York, 1983)
Local 201, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. Shaker, Travis & Quinn, Inc.
555 F. Supp. 314 (S.D. New York, 1983)
District 2 Marine Engineers Beneficial Association-Associated Maritime Officers, Afl-Cio v. Grand Bassa Tankers, Inc.
663 F.2d 392 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Local 344 Leather Goods, Plastics & Novelty Workers' Union v. Singer Co.
478 F. Supp. 441 (N.D. Illinois, 1979)
Chattanooga Mailers' Union, Local No. 92 v. The Chattanooga News-Free Press Company
524 F.2d 1305 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
361 F.2d 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-seltzer-co-v-livingston-ca2-1966.