A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston
361 F.2d 218
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 20, 1966·No. No. 409, Docket 30400·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
We affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint seeking to stay arbitration for the reasons stated in Judge McLean’s opinion below, 253 F.Supp. 509.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston, 361 F.2d 218 (2d Cir. 1966).
361 F.2d 218 (A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baron Buick, Inc. v. Local 259
563 F. Supp. 688 (E.D. New York, 1983)
Local 201, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. Shaker, Travis & Quinn, Inc.
555 F. Supp. 314 (S.D. New York, 1983)
District 2 Marine Engineers Beneficial Association-Associated Maritime Officers, Afl-Cio v. Grand Bassa Tankers, Inc.
663 F.2d 392 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Local 344 Leather Goods, Plastics & Novelty Workers' Union v. Singer Co.
478 F. Supp. 441 (N.D. Illinois, 1979)
Chattanooga Mailers' Union, Local No. 92 v. The Chattanooga News-Free Press Company
524 F.2d 1305 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)