A. Schraders Son Div. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 229
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedAugust 2, 1960
DocketNo. 64429; protest 302329-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Cust. Ct. 229 (A. Schraders Son Div. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A. Schraders Son Div. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 229 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wire rods similar in all material respects to those the subject of Scoville Manufacturing Co., A. Schrader’s Son Division v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 259, C.D. 2138), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scoville Manufacturing Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 259 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cust. Ct. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-schraders-son-div-v-united-states-cusc-1960.