A. Sahadi & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

A. Sahadi & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 317

United States Customs Court·Decided December 28, 1955·No. No. 59636; protest 229261-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

At the trial, the collector’s letter of transmittal was received in evidence. Said letter states that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 17)4 percent under paragraph 775, as modified, supra, but that the time prescribed in section 515 of the tariff act for review of the liquidation had expired without action by the collector. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

At the trial, the collector’s letter of transmittal was received in evidence. Said letter states that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 17)4 percent under paragraph 775, as modified, supra, but that the time prescribed in section 515 of the tariff act for review of the liquidation had expired without action by the collector. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

A. Sahadi & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 317 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 317 (A. Sahadi & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.