A & S Trucking Service, Inc. v. New York State Thruway Authority

268 A.D.2d 493, 702 N.Y.S.2d 347
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 2000
DocketClaim No. 1; Claim No. 75782; Claim No. 6; Claim No. 78345
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 493 (A & S Trucking Service, Inc. v. New York State Thruway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A & S Trucking Service, Inc. v. New York State Thruway Authority, 268 A.D.2d 493, 702 N.Y.S.2d 347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In related claims, inter alla, to recover damages for injury to property and a third-party claim in Claim No. 6 for a judgment declaring the rights of the parties under certain insurance policies, Continental Casualty Insurance Company, the third-party defendant in Claim No. 6, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (King, J.), dated November 27, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that it was obligated to provide a defense to the defendant third-party claimant New York State Thruway Authority in the main claims.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of a trial court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is not supported by legally sufficient evidence or could not have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Greenberg v Behlen, 220 AD2d 720). The evidence here is legally sufficient to support the determination that the appellant was equitably estopped from denying coverage to the defendant third-party plaintiff. Further, the determination was based upon a fair interpreta[494]*494tian of the evidence (see, Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr. v Centennial Ins. Co., 258 AD2d 491; Indemnity Ins. Co. v Charter Oak Ins. Co., 235 AD2d 521). Joy, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anastasio v. Bartone
22 A.D.3d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Earth Alterations, LLC v. Farrell
21 A.D.3d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Ultra Flex Packaging Corp. v. I.J. Litwak & Co.
21 A.D.3d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Halpern v. Goldstein & Halpern, C.P.A.
18 A.D.3d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Martin Iron & Construction Co. v. Grace Industries, Inc.
14 A.D.3d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Chambers v. McIntyre
5 A.D.3d 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Warm v. State
308 A.D.2d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Buoninfante v. Legacy Development USA Corp.
306 A.D.2d 511 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Melendez v. State
283 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 493, 702 N.Y.S.2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-s-trucking-service-inc-v-new-york-state-thruway-authority-nyappdiv-2000.