A & S Sontag Co. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 66, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2278
United States Customs Court·Decided August 1, 1967·No. C.D. 3074·Published

Opinion

Righaedson. Judge:

Upon the call of the calendar, defendant moved for a dismissal of the instant protest on the ground that the protest was untimely filed.

It appears from the official papers before the court that the consumption entry the subject of this protest (No. 318120) was liquidated April 28, 1966, and that the protest, bearing date of April 28, 1966, is stamped “Received” under date of June 28, 1966. Consequently, it [67]*67is established in the record prima facie at least that the instant protest was filed 61 calendar days after the date of liquidation, or one day too late. Under these circumstances, the instant protest is untimely, and is, therefore, dismissed for untimeliness.

Judgment will he entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A & S Sontag Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 66, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2278 (cusc 1967).

59 Cust. Ct. 66 (A & S Sontag Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.