A & S Sontag Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

A & S Sontag Co. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 66, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2278

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 1, 1967

DocketC.D. 3074

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 66 (A & S Sontag Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A & S Sontag Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 66, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2278 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Righaedson. Judge:

Upon the call of the calendar, defendant moved for a dismissal of the instant protest on the ground that the protest was untimely filed.

It appears from the official papers before the court that the consumption entry the subject of this protest (No. 318120) was liquidated April 28, 1966, and that the protest, bearing date of April 28, 1966, is stamped “Received” under date of June 28, 1966. Consequently, it [67]*67is established in the record prima facie at least that the instant protest was filed 61 calendar days after the date of liquidation, or one day too late. Under these circumstances, the instant protest is untimely, and is, therefore, dismissed for untimeliness.

Judgment will he entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Righaedson. Judge:

Upon the call of the calendar, defendant moved for a dismissal of the instant protest on the ground that the protest was untimely filed.

It appears from the official papers before the court that the consumption entry the subject of this protest (No. 318120) was liquidated April 28, 1966, and that the protest, bearing date of April 28, 1966, is stamped “Received” under date of June 28, 1966. Consequently, it [67]*67is established in the record prima facie at least that the instant protest was filed 61 calendar days after the date of liquidation, or one day too late. Under these circumstances, the instant protest is untimely, and is, therefore, dismissed for untimeliness.

Judgment will he entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 66, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-s-sontag-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.