A. S. Samper & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

A. S. Samper & Co. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 281

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 28, 1956

DocketNo. 60086; protest 251695-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Cust. Ct. 281 (A. S. Samper & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A. S. Samper & Co. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 281 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that four bales of twine reported by fhe inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was [282]*282held that duty is not assessable upon the merchandise which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that four bales of twine reported by fhe inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was [282]*282held that duty is not assessable upon the merchandise which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Cust. Ct. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-s-samper-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.