A & S Liquidating Company v. Albert H. Carter

Fifth Circuit

A & S Liquidating Company v. Albert H. Carter

465 F.2d 359

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 5, 1972

Docket72-2144

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 465 F.2d 359 (A & S Liquidating Company v. Albert H. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A & S Liquidating Company v. Albert H. Carter, 465 F.2d 359 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The deficiency of the record in this case prevents us from considering it upon its merits. The case is remanded and the parties are instructed to supplement the record within thirty days with any documents that have been filed in the district court but are not included in the record on appeal. Fed.R.App.P. 10(e); see Soley v. Star & Herald Co., 5 Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d 364; Foley Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp., 5 Cir., 1961, 286 F.2d 697.

Remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The deficiency of the record in this case prevents us from considering it upon its merits. The case is remanded and the parties are instructed to supplement the record within thirty days with any documents that have been filed in the district court but are not included in the record on appeal. Fed.R.App.P. 10(e); see Soley v. Star & Herald Co., 5 Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d 364; Foley Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp., 5 Cir., 1961, 286 F.2d 697.

Remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

465 F.2d 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/a-s-liquidating-company-v-albert-h-carter-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack