A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 452, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 354
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Cust. Ct. 120
United States Customs Court·Decided May 13, 1953·No. No. 57324; protests 928441-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[453]*453Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480); that the items marked “D” consist of dogskins the same as those involved in S. M. Brachman & Co. et al. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389); and that the items marked “G” consist of goatskins the same as those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra, only insofar as the items marked “A” are concerned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 452, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 354 (cusc 1953).

30 Cust. Ct. 452 (A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S. M. Brachman & Co. v. United States
5 Cust. Ct. 153 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)
Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 266 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)