A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States
Opinion
[453]*453Opinion by
It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480); that the items marked “D” consist of dogskins the same as those involved in S. M. Brachman & Co. et al. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389); and that the items marked “G” consist of goatskins the same as those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
30 Cust. Ct. 452 (A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.